We'd appreciate your feedback. Send feedback Subscribe to our newsletters and alerts


Annals of Pharmacy Education, Safety, and Public Health Advocacy

2024 Volume 4

Assessing the Viability of Remote Patient Monitoring in High-Risk Oncology Populations


, , , , , , , , , ,
  1. Applied Clinical Neurosciences Research Group, Department of Medicine, Dermatology and Toxicology, University of Valladolid, 47005 Valladolid, Spain.
  2. Department of Nursing, University of Valladolid, 47005 Valladolid, Spain.
  3. Department of Internal Medicine, University Clinical Hospital of Valladolid, 47003 Valladolid, Spain.
  4. Department of Internal Medicine, Rio Hortega University Hospital, 47012 Valladolid, Spain.
  5. Emergency Medical Services Direction, SACyL, 47006 Valladolid, Spain.
  6. Technical Direction of Primary Care, SACyL, 47006 Valladolid, Spain.
  7. Department of Neurology, University Clinical Hospital of Valladolid, 47003 Valladolid, Spain.
Abstract

Posthospital care aims to enhance patient access to providers and reduce avoidable readmissions. This study assessed the feasibility, barriers, and influencing factors associated with implementing remote patient monitoring (RPM) for oncology patients at the Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute (HHC) in Hartford, CT, and across a statewide health system. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining quantitative surveys with qualitative interviews and focus groups to gather insights from hospital stakeholders. The focus was on organizational culture, leadership, learning capacity, and available resources for RPM implementation. Surveys were distributed between September 1 and 30, 2022, and responses were analyzed based on frequency and percentage. Items with the highest rates of neutral or negative responses informed subsequent qualitative data collection. Purposeful sampling was employed to recruit stakeholders and patients for interviews and focus groups conducted between January 1 and 30, 2023. Organizational maps were created to visualize current and prospective clinical workflows. Of 63 stakeholders invited to complete the readiness for implementation survey, 53 responded (84% response rate), with 67% supporting RPM to improve patient care. The interviews and focus group discussions revealed stakeholder perspectives on readiness for change, organizational climate, resource availability, and perceived barriers and facilitators to change. In total, 78 participants—including survey respondents, Patient and Family Advisory Council (PFAC) members, and hospital staff—were invited to participate in qualitative data collection, with 52 individuals (67%) agreeing to participate. 8 one-on-one interviews and six focus groups were conducted. Key themes included integrating RPM into existing systems, relevance to care teams, and prioritizing patient- and family-centered care. Additional subthemes were also identified. Stakeholders supported RPM as a means to enhance communication and improve access to care for patients with oncology. Providers emphasized critical success factors, including dedicated intervention teams, effective response protocols for symptom alerts, and system-wide access to clinical data. Patient participants underlined the importance of incorporating patient-centered design into RPM program development.


How to cite this article
Vancouver
Alcoceba-Herrero I, Coco-Martín MB, Jiménez-Pérez JM, Leal-Vega L, Martín-Gutiérrez A, Dueñas-Gutiérrez C, et al. Assessing the Viability of Remote Patient Monitoring in High-Risk Oncology Populations. Ann Pharm Educ Saf Public Health Advocacy. 2024;4:75-84. https://doi.org/10.51847/Xx3YMxI0l6
APA
Alcoceba-Herrero, I., Coco-Martín, M. B., Jiménez-Pérez, J. M., Leal-Vega, L., Martín-Gutiérrez, A., Dueñas-Gutiérrez, C., Miramontes-González, J. P., Corral-Gudino, L., Castro-Rodríguez, F. D., Royuela-Ruiz, P., et al. (2024). Assessing the Viability of Remote Patient Monitoring in High-Risk Oncology Populations. Annals of Pharmacy Education, Safety, and Public Health Advocacy, 4, 75-84. https://doi.org/10.51847/Xx3YMxI0l6
Articles
TikTok’s Influence on Pharmacy Education: Enhancing Drug Information Mastery through Distance Learning
Annals of Pharmacy Education, Safety, and Public Health Advocacy
Vol 2 , 2022 | Bahar Graefen
One Hundred Years of Nobel Lectures Expose a Lack of Mentor Recognition
Annals of Pharmacy Education, Safety, and Public Health Advocacy
Vol 5 , 2025 | Thomas Schlich
Assessing Reliability and Measurement Invariance of the Slovak Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale
Annals of Pharmacy Education, Safety, and Public Health Advocacy
Vol 5 , 2025 | Paola Ferri
Designing a Healthcare Utilization Index to Enable Worldwide Patient Comparisons: A Cross-Sectional Study
Annals of Pharmacy Education, Safety, and Public Health Advocacy
Vol 4 , 2024 | Jhoyce S. Souza
Advancing Education through AI: The Role of ChatGPT as Virtual Tutors in the Future of Learning
Annals of Pharmacy Education, Safety, and Public Health Advocacy
Vol 3 , 2023 | Bahar Graefen
The Evolution of Simulation as a Teaching Strategy in Oncology: Global Bibliometric Insights
Annals of Pharmacy Education, Safety, and Public Health Advocacy
Vol 5 , 2025 | Hongjun Ba
The Medical Education Research Landscape: Focus Areas and Key Scholars
Annals of Pharmacy Education, Safety, and Public Health Advocacy
Vol 5 , 2025 | Javier A. Flores-Cohaila
Assessing Procedural Training for Internal Medicine Residents: Insights from Fellowship Program Directors
Annals of Pharmacy Education, Safety, and Public Health Advocacy
Vol 5 , 2025 | Nizar Bhulani
Enhancing Virtual Medical History Taking: Effects of Customized Guidelines in Two Serious Games for Medical Education
Annals of Pharmacy Education, Safety, and Public Health Advocacy
Vol 5 , 2025 | Robertas Damaševičius

About SMER

Find out more