We'd appreciate your feedback. Send feedback Subscribe to our newsletters and alerts


Asian Journal of Ethics in Health and Medicine

2024 Volume 4 Issue 1

Human Rights and Bioethical Principles in Correctional Settings: A Systematic Review of the Evidence


,
  1. School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  2. National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Abstract

Safeguarding human rights and adhering to bioethical principles in prisons are essential for society and directly influence the overall health of the wider population. However, such principles are often inadequately upheld in correctional facilities, leaving prisoners exposed to abuse that severely impacts their physical and mental well-being. A systematic review was conducted using a MESH-based search strategy with the following terms: (bioethics) AND (prison), (ethics) AND (prison), (bioethics) AND (jail), (ethics) AND (jail), (bioethics) AND (penitentiary), (ethics) AND (penitentiary), (prison) AND (human rights). After applying predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, 17 studies were included. Among the 17 selected publications, the majority were prevalence studies (n=5) and surveys (n=4), followed by cross-sectional studies (n=3), one qualitative study, one retrospective study, and one explanatory sequential mixed-methods design. Most works examined the relationship between bioethics and prisoners’ access to healthcare for conditions such as vaccination, tuberculosis, hepatitis, and HIV. Other studies highlighted ethical concerns related to mental health, disability, ageing, women’s health, suicide risk, and end-of-life requests. Overall, the findings point to systemic deficiencies in upholding bioethical standards and respecting human rights within prisons. Prisoners frequently face barriers to healthcare, elevated risks of suicide and disability, exploitation as organ donors, and restricted autonomy that undermines their ability to make decisions regarding end-of-life care. To address these shortcomings, prison personnel—including healthcare providers, security staff, and administrators—should engage in continuous training to promote compliance with ethical norms and the protection of human rights.


How to cite this article
Vancouver
Leadbeatter D, Tjaya KC. Human Rights and Bioethical Principles in Correctional Settings: A Systematic Review of the Evidence. Asian J Ethics Health Med. 2024;4(1):97-106. https://doi.org/10.51847/wSNBedLrGt
APA
Leadbeatter, D., & Tjaya, K. C. (2024). Human Rights and Bioethical Principles in Correctional Settings: A Systematic Review of the Evidence. Asian Journal of Ethics in Health and Medicine, 4(1), 97-106. https://doi.org/10.51847/wSNBedLrGt
Articles
Smart Home Health Technologies and Elder Care: Mapping Ethical Issues Through a Systematic Review
Asian Journal of Ethics in Health and Medicine
Vol 2 Issue 1, 2022 | Ana Seselja Perisin
Human Rights and Bioethical Principles in Correctional Settings: A Systematic Review of the Evidence
Asian Journal of Ethics in Health and Medicine
Vol 4 Issue 1, 2024 | Delyse Leadbeatter
Building Trust in the Application of Machine Learning Algorithms for Rare Disease Diagnosis
Asian Journal of Ethics in Health and Medicine
Vol 3 Issue 1, 2023 | Lukas Lembo
The Ethics of Reversibility: Why High-Stakes Clinical Decisions Need Paths Back
Asian Journal of Ethics in Health and Medicine
Vol 6 Issue 1, 2026 | Wouter De Smet
The Right to a Human Reason: Contestability in High-Stakes Clinical Decisions
Asian Journal of Ethics in Health and Medicine
Vol 6 Issue 1, 2026 | Rafael Mendoza
Moral Residue After Algorithmic Advice
Asian Journal of Ethics in Health and Medicine
Vol 6 Issue 1, 2026 | Wei Zhang
From Informed Consent to Informed Dependence: Rethinking Autonomy in AI-Mediated Clinical Care
Asian Journal of Ethics in Health and Medicine
Vol 6 Issue 1, 2026 | Mikko Lahtinen

About SMER

Find out more