We'd appreciate your feedback. Send feedback Subscribe to our newsletters and alerts


Archive of International Journal of Cancer and Allied Science

2025 Volume 5 Issue 2

Outcomes of Everolimus Combined with Exemestane in HR-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer after CDK4/6 Inhibitor Exposure


, , ,
  1. Department of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Abstract

Everolimus (EVE) combined with exemestane (EXE) is currently approved for treating patients with metastatic hormone receptor–positive breast cancer (mHRBC) who no longer respond to nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors (NSAIs). Notably, the BOLERO-2 trial, which supported this approval, did not include patients who had previously received CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is), now widely used as first-line therapy for mHRBC. Therefore, the benefits and clinical outcomes of EVE plus EXE in patients with prior CDK4/6i exposure have yet to be established. We conducted a retrospective analysis of adult patients with metastatic hormone receptor–positive breast cancer (mHRBC) at our center who had disease progression following treatment with either a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) alone or in combination with a CDK4/6 inhibitor, and who subsequently received at least one cycle of everolimus (EVE) plus exemestane (EXE) between 2012 and 2018. Information collected included patient demographics, prior therapies, adverse events, and treatment outcomes. The study primarily aimed to assess differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between patients with prior NSAI plus CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy and those who received NSAI monotherapy. Of the 43 patients analyzed, 17 had previously received CDK4/6 inhibitors. Apart from differences in the incidence of de novo metastatic disease, the two groups were largely comparable in terms of patient demographics and disease characteristics. Median progression-free survival was 3.6 months for the CDK4/6i-exposed group versus 4.2 months for those without prior exposure, while median overall survival was 15.6 months versus 11.3 months, with no statistically significant differences observed between the cohorts. Previous treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors did not affect survival outcomes in patients with metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer receiving everolimus combined with exemestane. Nevertheless, a trend toward better overall survival was observed in the CDK4/6 inhibitor-treated group, warranting further assessment in larger patient populations. The combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors with a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor has established itself as the standard first-line treatment for metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Everolimus combined with exemestane is an approved therapy in subsequent lines; however, the pivotal data supporting this regimen were generated before CDK4/6 inhibitors became available. Consequently, the clinical efficacy of everolimus plus exemestane following prior CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment remained unclear. This retrospective cohort study provides real-world evidence indicating that previous exposure to CDK4/6 inhibitors does not adversely affect survival outcomes with everolimus plus exemestane.


How to cite this article
Vancouver
Huber MA, Bauer LS, Gruber FK, Müller EW. Outcomes of Everolimus Combined with Exemestane in HR-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer after CDK4/6 Inhibitor Exposure. Arch Int J Cancer Allied Sci. 2025;5(2):44-50. https://doi.org/10.51847/sJNxEiRZXn
APA
Huber, M. A., Bauer, L. S., Gruber, F. K., & Müller, E. W. (2025). Outcomes of Everolimus Combined with Exemestane in HR-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer after CDK4/6 Inhibitor Exposure. Archive of International Journal of Cancer and Allied Science, 5(2), 44-50. https://doi.org/10.51847/sJNxEiRZXn
Articles
Oncogenic Potential of Persistent Human Papillomavirus Infection
Archive of International Journal of Cancer and Allied Science
Vol 4 Issue 1, 2024 | Delia Nica-Badea
Theoretical Assessment of the Interaction Between Selected Quinolone Derivatives and RSK-4
Archive of International Journal of Cancer and Allied Science
Vol 2 Issue 2, 2022 | Marcela RosasNexticapa
Reevaluating Prognostic Tools in Follicular Lymphoma: Should the PRIMA Prognostic Index Supersede FLIPI2?
Archive of International Journal of Cancer and Allied Science
Vol 3 Issue 2, 2023 | Ngoc Dung Nguyen
Diagnostic and Therapeutic Insights into Colorectal Carcinoma
Archive of International Journal of Cancer and Allied Science
Vol 2 Issue 1, 2022 | Vlad Denis Constantin
Ewing’s Sarcoma in a 58-Year-Old Man: Challenges of Cancer Diagnosis During the COVID-19 Era
Archive of International Journal of Cancer and Allied Science
Vol 2 Issue 1, 2022 | Damian Mojsak
Upregulation of PHOX1 Driven by Hypomethylation Accelerates Gastric Cancer Progression through NGFR Transactivation
Archive of International Journal of Cancer and Allied Science
Vol 1 Issue 1, 2021 | Ahmed Youssef El Sayed
Macrophage CCL7 Drives Colorectal Cancer Immunotherapy Resistance by Modulating Macrophage and CD8⁺ T Cell Infiltration
Archive of International Journal of Cancer and Allied Science
Vol 1 Issue 1, 2021 | Marco Antonio Bianchi
Oncogenic Role of CircIL4R in Colorectal Cancer via Regulation of the PI3K/AKT Signaling and miR-761/TRIM29/PHLPP1 Axis
Archive of International Journal of Cancer and Allied Science
Vol 5 Issue 2, 2025 | Marco De Santis
STC1–Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Positive Feedback Loop Drives Immune Escape and Metastasis in Bladder Cancer
Archive of International Journal of Cancer and Allied Science
Vol 1 Issue 1, 2021 | Sarah Louise Bennett
O-GlcNAcylation of SPOP Controls Colorectal Cancer Development and Ferroptosis through Modulation of β-Catenin Degradation
Archive of International Journal of Cancer and Allied Science
Vol 1 Issue 1, 2021 | Mateusz Piotr Kowalczyk

About SMER

Find out more