We'd appreciate your feedback. Send feedback Subscribe to our newsletters and alerts


Asian Journal of Ethics in Health and Medicine

2024 Volume 4

Evaluating the CARE Intervention for Improving Ethical Confidence in Dementia Care Professionals


, , , , ,
  1. National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Abstract

Few programs specifically aim to raise healthcare professionals’ assurance when facing ethical dilemmas in dementia care, even though training initiatives have repeatedly demonstrated benefits for staff knowledge and self-efficacy. Still, mixed results reported in existing studies regarding the true value of these educational efforts emphasize the demand for more precise, purpose-built solutions. The CARE intervention was created expressly to build confidence in ethical decision-making and to close this shortfall. This research investigates the impact of the CARE intervention on boosting ethical self-efficacy among healthcare staff who care for individuals with dementia, with particular focus on those entering the program with particularly low self-efficacy. The study adopted a non-experimental pre-post evaluation approach. The CARE intervention was provided to healthcare professionals (n = 86), and their ethical self-efficacy was recorded both prior to and following participation. We anticipated notable shifts in average ethical self-efficacy scores from before to after the program across all participants, with the strongest gains predicted among those starting with low baseline scores, as this group was expected to gain the most. Analyses included paired t-tests for the overall group and Wilcoxon tests for the low pre-score subgroup.

No meaningful difference was observed in the full participant group. In contrast, individuals who began with low self-efficacy showed a clear, statistically significant increase in their scores after the intervention ended. The CARE intervention offers promising potential to strengthen ethical self-efficacy, especially for healthcare professionals who initially feel less confident. Such focused efforts are critical for narrowing existing confidence gaps when addressing ethical problems in dementia care. These gains carry important consequences for staff wellbeing and the standard of care delivered. Subsequent investigations should track long-term outcomes and use larger samples to improve the extent to which the results can be applied and their durability over time.


How to cite this article
Vancouver
Schou-Juul F, Ferm LT, Kinch S, Skov SS, Ritz C, Lauridsen S. Evaluating the CARE Intervention for Improving Ethical Confidence in Dementia Care Professionals. Asian J Ethics Health Med. 2024;4:329-36. https://doi.org/10.51847/19YCICYV5V
APA
Schou-Juul, F., Ferm, L. T., Kinch, S., Skov, S. S., Ritz, C., & Lauridsen, S. (2024). Evaluating the CARE Intervention for Improving Ethical Confidence in Dementia Care Professionals. Asian Journal of Ethics in Health and Medicine, 4, 329-336. https://doi.org/10.51847/19YCICYV5V
Articles
Smart Home Health Technologies and Elder Care: Mapping Ethical Issues Through a Systematic Review
Asian Journal of Ethics in Health and Medicine
Vol 2 , 2022 | Ana Seselja Perisin
Human Rights and Bioethical Principles in Correctional Settings: A Systematic Review of the Evidence
Asian Journal of Ethics in Health and Medicine
Vol 4 , 2024 | Delyse Leadbeatter
Ethical Climate and Overtime as Determinants of Moral Courage in Hospital Nursing Staff
Asian Journal of Ethics in Health and Medicine
Vol 5 , 2025 | Hamideh Hakimi
Obstacles to Ethical Practice: Understanding Moral Stress among Health Care Workers in COVID-19
Asian Journal of Ethics in Health and Medicine
Vol 5 , 2025 | Martina E. Gustavsson

About SMER

Find out more